Aubree Evans' MATL Portfolio

Multiple Instructional Strategies
Home
Resume
Philosophy
Biographical Portrait
Knowledge of Subject Matter
Knowledge of Human Development and Learning
Adapting Instruction for Individual Needs
Multiple Instructional Strategies
Classroom Motivation and Management
Communication Skills
Instructional Planning Skills
Assessment of Student Learning
Professional Commitment and Responsibility
Partnerships
Upon Reflection
Employing a Variety of Instructional Strategies

Standard Four
 
The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage students' development of critical thinking, problem solving, and performance skills.

Multiple Instructional Strategies Artifact 1

Name of Artifact: Elements of Contructive Language Teaching
Date: Summer 2003
Course: TSL 612
Rationale:
 
This artifact is the position paper I wrote for the Options in the Teaching of Grammar course that I took over the summer.  In the course we read about and discussed a variety of views on how grammar should be taught.
 
Since "Audiolingual" has become a nearly forbidden word in the field of language teaching, many teachers find it challenging coming to terms with how to teach (or not to teach) grammar in the language classroom.  This course presented us with many non-traditional options.
 
In this paper I highlight some of the different instructional methods that are presently supported by researchers.  Some think that explicit grammar instruction should be avoided and the focus should instead be placed on communication.  Others think that explicit instruction is necessary and yet others think that there is a happy middle ground between the two extremes.
 
My position on grammar is presented in this paper.  In addition, I touch on some methods that I don't necessarily agree with, but that show contrast between some of the varying views.  I believe that the key is to vary the type of instruction chosen depending on the needs of each group of learners.

Multiple Instructional Strategies Artifact 2

Name of Artifact: Case Study Activity
Date: Spring 2003
Course: FL 664 (SLA)
Rationale:
 
The following artifact is the activity I used in my Case Study project for Second Language Acquisition.  I gave my subject a list of math-related terms and tested the ways in which she knew them.  I tested her competency in listening, reading, speaking, and writing.
 
This activity allowed me to see what she needed the most help with.  As I expected, her listening, reading, and writing skills were excellent.  The only part of the assessment she lacked competency on was the oral production segment.
 
As her tutor, this new information helped me determine which direction to take to help to strengthen her performance.  At this point we began working on activities that required her to use vocabulary to complete tasks.  I used a variety of exercises that demanded oral production.  Finally, the one that was the most effective was having her tell me how to solve math problems as I worked them out on paper in front of her.
 
This activity worked really well.  It increased her competence and showed me how much she really knew.  However, had I had the opportunity to meet with this student more, I would not have continued to use the same method simply because it worked.  I think that it's important to experiment with a wide range of tasks that demand different skills and competencies of the learner.  Also, in a one-on-one tutoring situation, this is much easier to do than in a regular classroom.